Organizations as Phenomena of Language Use: Interconnecting Discourse and Communication

Convenors

Dennis Schoeneborn, University of Zurich, Switzerland,
dennis.schoeneborn@uzh.ch

Joep Cornelissen, VU University of Amsterdam, Netherlands,
jcornelissen@feweb.vu.nl

Timothy R. Kuhn, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA,
tim.kuhn@colorado.edu

Call for Papers

Scholars of organization have recently sought to theorize the very existence, operations, and influence of organizations as phenomena of language use. This development has occurred separately within two theoretical traditions. One of them, the organization-as-discourse approach (Boje, Oswick & Ford, 2004; Grant, Keenoy & Oswick, 1998), originates in the field of organization studies, and is mainly interested in the macro-level of discursive practices that transcend single organizations. In contrast, the organization-as-communication approach is rooted in the field of organizational communication, where scholars increasingly consider "communication as constitutive of organizations" (CCO; Ashcraft, Kuhn & Cooren 2009; Putnam & Nicotera, 2008). The guiding idea of the CCO view is to conceptualize organizations as accomplished in ongoing communicative practices, such as in a dynamic interplay of both texts and conversations (Taylor & van Every, 2000). In this way, CCO scholars seek to reconcile the macro-level with the micro-level of local interactions.

Drawing on the emerging CCO perspective, it is the aim of the sub-theme to connect these two related, though partly isolated, traditions of theorizing. A first promising point of connection is that both traditions share the assumption that organizations are constituted in and through language use and that organizing and communicating are inherently intertwined. A second, related point is the desire to see discourse and communication as not merely expressive or representational of internal states, but as processes that mould and produce – as well as destroy – the meanings axial to organizational existence and organizing practice.

We invite papers that advance theory and develop analytical frameworks and methods that will facilitate empirical inquiry from diverse perspectives. Here is a list of indicative, but not exhaustive, topics and questions related to the sub-theme:

• What are the opportunities for a further integration or at least a stronger mutual reception of research from both traditions, organizational discourse and organizational communication?
• How does a communication/discourse-centered perspective add to our understanding of managerial and organizational subjects such as leadership, knowledge, innovation, technology, organizational identity, control and resistance, sensemaking, process organizing, change, strategizing, or governance?
• How does a communication/discourse-centered perspective shape understandings of the organization's embeddedness in social contexts? In what ways do conceptions
  of the organization-society relationship that foreground communication offer alternative views on the theory of the firm, corporate responsibility, stakeholder relationships, institutionalization processes, or inter-organizational collaborations?
• What does a constitutive notion of communication imply for the strategic-instrumental management or even "design" of corporate or managerial communication processes?
• How do organizations cope with the contradicting tendencies between attempts to make organizational communication processes more integrated and consistent on the one hand, and the polyphony of the emergent practices of communication on the other hand?
• How does communication/discourse constitute organization? What is specific about organizational communication in contrast to other forms of communicative/discursive practices? If organizations are theorized to come into existence by ongoing practices of language use, how do organizations manage to interconnect and perpetuate these practices over time? How does the local occurrence of communication "scale up" to form the larger entity we call organization?
• What is the role of materiality (e.g., texts, tools, artifacts, bodies, spaces) for the communicative constitution of organizations?
• What are potentially fruitful links of a communication/discourse-centered perspective on organizations to other related theoretical streams, e.g., social systems
  theory, theories of social practices, process theories, institutionalism, or theories of social movements?
• What are appropriate methodologies to study organizations from a communication/discourse-centered perspective? How can we overcome the gap between examining conversations on a local level and the organization on a holistic level?

For further information please visit:
http://www.egos2012.net/2011/06/sub-theme-23-organizations-as-phenomena-of-language-use-interconnecting-discourse-and-communication/

Contact: Dennis Schoeneborn (University of Zurich);
dennis.schoeneborn@uzh.ch