Organization and Management Theory OMT

  • 1.  Call for Abstracts Creative Industries Subtheme EGOS 2009

    Posted 11-03-2008 10:11
    *Passion and Discipline in Creative Industries. EGOS 2009 Barcelona
    **EXTENDED ABSTRACTS of no more than 3000 words DUE January 11, 2009*

    Barcelona, with its seaside venues and dynamic plazas, offers a
    wonderful site for enthusiastic dialog and explorations in the linkages
    between individual creativity and firm creative and innovative processes
    in creative industries. We seek to extend our prior dialog on the
    tensions between art and commerce, dialectical processes by examining
    micro to macro level translation processes. How do creative actors shape
    their society, profession and art world? How do organizations and macro
    level forces channel, disrupt, enable or tame individual creators? We
    seek to explore these dynamics in the context of creative industries.

    We invite and celebrate a plurality of theoretical and empirical
    approaches addressing but not limited to the following topic areas:

    (1) Creative spaces: how do creative actors identify, engage and create
    social spaces and social relations that support their divergent and
    often controversial approaches? Creative artists have often had sponsors
    or patrons willing to take a risk and fly in the face of convention. For
    example, Frank Lloyd Wright, whose antics banished him from polite
    society, found wealthy entrepreneurs such as the Kauffman’s or Johnson’s
    who provided opportunities and funded his dreams. We know very little
    about the role of mentors, sponsors and patrons in modern creative
    activities and innovation. How do these relationships form? Who connects
    artists to patrons? How does the relationship enable or divert creative
    vision and talent?

    (2) The careers and social networks of contemporary artists and
    innovators may provide fruitful ground understanding the mechanisms of
    how passion is translated into a cultural product that ultimately may
    shape how we understand ourselves, our society and an art world.

    (3) How do competitions energize or compromise creative vision?
    Competitions such as design competitions in architecture or film
    festivals are critical yet understudied phenomena for how creative
    passion and ideas are channeled and recognized, shaping a field? How do
    these competitive and field events channel or derail creative passion?

    (4) What institutional and social resources do mavericks, innovators and
    rebels draw upon in order to realize their vision? How does social
    skill, in Fligstein’s (1997, 2001) terms, enable a creator to take
    advantage of ideas and drive these toward realization? What do these
    social skills look like?

    (5) How can we study failure versus success in creative entrepreneurs in
    order to identify these social skills? What institutional logics and
    resources facilitate creativity and innovation? Since multiple
    institutional logics co-exist, which logics and when do these logics
    become enabling rather constraining forces for creativity and innovation?

    (6) What creative leaders have had a profound impact on their creative
    industry? How did they alter practices, rules of collaboration or
    understanding of creative products? What strategies did they pursue? How
    have these strategies in turn been influenced by institutional logics
    and supported by organizational structures?

    (7) How do institutionalized logics, regimes and gatekeepers stifle or
    facilitate entrepreneurial initiatives in creative industries? How do
    the networks of relationships provide the connectivity needed for novel
    ideas to emerge and thrive, as well as for mainstream output to persist
    the coupling and uncoupling of art and business? Art and business are
    two threads in creative industries that are often tightly woven and just
    as often in tension and decoupled. Business practices and concerns may
    drive the art form, or be uncoupled with it as innovative practitioners
    create niches and arenas for experimentation, such as independent film.

    (8) What is the relationship between individual creators and creative
    firms? How is reputation from individual creators embedded in firm
    renown? What is the intrinsic value of a creative firm if the creative
    individual leaves? How can individual reputation be transferred to
    creative firms?

    *_Co-convenors:_*

    /Candace Jones/ (Boston College) e-mail: jonescq@bc.edu
    <mailto:jonescq@bc.edu>
    Jesper Strandgaard (Copenhagen Business School ) e-mail: js.ioa@cbs.dk
    <mailto:js.ioa@cbs.dk>
    Vincent Mangematin (Grenoble Ecole de Management and GAEL) e-mail:
    vincent@grenoble.inra.fr <mailto:vincent@grenoble.inra.fr>


  • 2.  Call for Abstracts Creative Industries Subtheme EGOS 2009

    Posted 11-03-2008 14:11
    Dear All,
     
     
    I hope all is well
     
    I got involved in a project to develop executive training in my school. I added many new concepts beside updated the basic ones. Could you please help me by providing some of the most important sfot skills for the new era. Please let me know
    Thanks
    Sincerely yours
    Dr. Eman ElShenawy
    Ph.D. From Washington State University, USA
    Lecturer at Suez Canal University, Eg
    eman996@yahoo.com
    +2-016-953-2862