Organization and Management Theory OMT

  • 1.  No Subject

    Posted 07-27-2018 09:10

    PDW invitation to scholars interested in Managing Involvement in Exceptional Process Research

     

    Engaged and Engaging: Managing Involvement in Exceptional Process Research


    Session Type: PDW Workshop


    Program Session: 189 | Submission: 11253 | Sponsor(s): (RM, OMT, SAP, TIM)

    Scheduled: Friday, Aug 10 2018 6:00PM - 8:00PM at Sheraton Grand Chicago in Sheraton Ballroom III 

     

    Organizer: Claus Rerup, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management

    Presenter: Ann Langley, HEC Montréal

    Presenter: Majken Schultz, Copenhagen Business School

    Presenter: Andrew H. Van de Ven, U. of Minnesota

    Presenter: Gail Whiteman, Lancaster U. Management School

    Facilitator: Kimberly D. Elsbach, U. of California, Davis

    Facilitator: Martha S. Feldman, U. of California, Irvine

    Facilitator: Jennifer Howard-Grenville, Cambridge Judge Business School

    Facilitator: Paula Jarzabkowski, City U. London

    Facilitator: Brian T. Pentland, Michigan State U.

     

    Building off the successful workshops on process research organized over the past 14 years, this year's workshop focuses on managing involvement in exceptional process research. The "involvement paradox" is an important, but overlooked aspect of the qualitative research process (Langley and Klag, 2017). The essence of this paradox is that on the one hand, process scholars want to get as close as possible to the process phenomena and experiences they are studying, and to study them for prolonged periods of time in order to enhance the richness and quality of their understanding and interpretation; yet on the other hand, such deep and long term engagement may sometimes have unsuspected implications for the nature of the knowledge created. Consequently, the workshop is designed to allow junior scholars an opportunity to engage with more experienced experts so as to convey in their own work the richness and emotion enabled by proximity and prolonged engagement, but also to convey adequate professional distance so that their work will not be dismissed as biased, blind, self-serving or unscientific.